1/17/2024 0 Comments Canon frame cameras 1080p![]() Recently I was asked by a client why I prefer to shoot these jobs on my Canon 1DX II, 5D Mark IV and Panasonic GH5, as the other videographer they use brings in a Canon C-series camera for all his jobs. When I'm shooting for the latter, I'll do it as a one-man-show, on location and in four hours or less. This is a difference of $500K multi-day, large crew job, and a one man, half-day $2K shoot. An "Apple" is going to spend a lot more money on ads than your local credit union, but both have marketing goals that require video. Part of that is an education issue that falls on us as videographers, and part of it that there will always be different tiers of customers. Yes, the final product is exceptional, but it is often out of reach even for larger companies. For larger sets, the setup can take a full day.Īs you can imagine, the costs for these larger set pieces is high. Working quickly, a team can get this setup in place and ready to go in about an hour and a half. And this setup makes for truly spectacular video.īut these setups take time and a crew. We truck in cases upon cases of cameras, lenses, adapters, tripods, audio equipment and gimbals, as well as grip and lighting equipment. We shoot with full-size camcorders in log profiles to external recorders. When my team, and that means more than just me, are hired for a large job, we go all out. UHS-I U3 card okay for IPB video and HD resolutionsĪs a commercial filmmaker, I use the cameras that work best for certain situations.UHS-II V60 (Video Speed Class 60) SD card required for ALL-I recording at 4K. ![]() C-Log profile option, with either internal and external recording.It does have the ability to record even higher quality footage to an external recorder, but let's just focus on what you can expect by spending the least amount of money as possible and only using what comes in the box. It has quite a lot that works well, and I'm going to discuss just what you can do with simply the camera and a lens. It has its place, and when used in that place it does a very good job.Īside from photography, where there is quite a lot to be pleased with as we've noted, the EOS R is a very solid video-making device. ![]() ![]() So while I do agree that the EOS R lacks in places compared to its competition, it is by no means a bad camera. There are photographers who shoot full time who make beautiful work with cameras from five, ten, even thirty years ago. But those are not mutually exclusive descriptors. Is it game-changing and future proof? No, it's not. I'll say it again: The EOS R is not a bad camera. And what does that second part even mean? That a professional would never buy it? How would you know? I'm a professional, and I used it successfully on three separate commercial video shoots. I've even heard that it's "not a professional camera." But where things get dicey is when someone is willing to say that the EOS R is a "bad camera" because it may not stack up to what the Sony Alpha does. When we look at the Canon EOS R, the immediate reaction is to compare it to the Sony line, and I understand that and did it myself. They work for a large group of people, and that is exactly what Nissan and Chevrolet were going for. They're different takes on a wholly game-changing idea, but they are not ridiculed for those takes. The Nissan Leaf is not a Tesla Model S, but it sells well. This seems odd to me, as there are very few industries where we hold this kind of a standard over the manufacturers. We've gotten to the point where we've been spoiled by technological achievements, and if a new product doesn't take us beyond the best that is out there, then it is a failure. Though these things are nice, they should not be considered a necessity. There seems to be this pervasive belief that in order for a camera to be good, it has to be somehow life-changing, industry-shattering, and future proof.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |